In Las Vegas, an eye-catching political ad shot on a cellphone

As a registered independent at the New to Las Vegas world headquarters, I don’t vote in party primaries. And as a journalist I don’t make political endorsements. But I get to critique, like a movie critic. I did this two years ago about an antisemitic campaign mailing put out by the Nevada Central Republican Committee against U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen.

Now, at a time when the two top-grossing Hollywood films were made by YouTube creators, I have to admire the utter image cleverness and seeming cost-efficiency of the nearby ad shot on a cell phone for Joe Dalia. He’s one of three candidates vying for the Democratic nomination in next week’s primary to be Nevada state treasurer.

Since the incumbent is term-limited, this is an open position and hotly contested. All the candidates–including Dalia–are complete nobodies statewide. So an ad like this, if it catches on, can make the difference in candidate name recognition, and therefore success.

Now, for all of his aw-shucks, I’m-just-cheap persona, Dalia is a lawyer who used to work for Meta. He found the scratch to air this ad during expensive breaks on CNN. And I imagine it wasn’t edited on his cellphone. For all of its charm, it’s clearly not a complete selfie; you can see both of Dalia’s hands. Someone else was operating his cellphone camera.

In the 30-second ad, Dahia says, “Do you know Nevada’s holding a billion dollars in unclaimed funds? I’ll do more to get that back to you.” What he doesn’t say is that he’s on record stating that money from that fund should go to state education programs and perhaps a state development fund schools, rather than directly to taxpayers, as a viewer might surmise.

But I digress. It’s a helluva pitch.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on X by clicking here.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on BlueSky by clicking here.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on Threads by clicking here.

Hey, someone tell the Las Vegas newspaper the airport name was changed in 2021

In 2021–on December 14 to be precise–the name of the major airport in Las Vegas was officially changed to Harry Reid International Airport. The idea was to honor the longtime U.S. senator from Nevada through 2017, who died just two weeks later at age 82. The old name had memorialized another long-time Nevada senator, Pat McCarran. He was a proponent of aviation whose political persona in later life before his 1954 death at age 78–racist, antisemitic, anti-free press and maybe corrupt–had not weathered well.

So it was a little surprising at the New To Las Vegas world headquarters today to open the Las Vegas Review-Journal (yes, I still get the paper, along with others, thrown to the door) and see the map displayed nearby. It shows the route of a new water pipeline to be built across the Las Vegas area. Toward the upper left-hand corner is labeled … “McCarran International Airport.”

In this new age of AI, of course, one never knows where the underlying information is really coming from. But maybe this helps explain why the RJ, which editorially was never much of a fan of Reid, is now the second largest daily newspaper in the country never to have won nor be a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on X by clicking here.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on BlueSky by clicking here.

Follow William P. Barrett’s work on Threads by clicking here.

UPDATED: In Las Vegas, how about a perp pool on when the first Trump pardonee gets re-arrested?

perp pool

Jimmy Hoffa (via Wikipedia)

SEE UPDATES AT END OF POST

Originally published January 21, 2025
Updated January 22, 2025
Updated January 27, 2025
Updated January 28, 2025
Updated January 29, 2025
Updated February 7, 2025
Updated May 9, 2025
Updated May 11, 2025
Updated July 3, 2025
Updated October 21, 2025
Updated October 29, 2025
Updated November 19, 2025
Updated January 2, 2026
Updated February 16, 2026
Updated March 3, 2026
Updated March 5, 2026
Updated April 1, 2026 
Updated May 17, 2026

A half-century ago, I was part of a ghoulish office pool started in the Philadelphia bureau of the Associated Press, where I worked at the time. On what day of the week would Jimmy Hoffa’s body be found? He was the convicted, mobbed-up ex-Teamsters Union president who suddenly vanished after leaving a Detroit-area restaurant in 1975. His disappearance quickly became a national sensation. It was widely believed–then and now–Hoffa was done in at the behest of one of his supposed organized crime cronies.

Six of us hacks each pitched in $5.00 (about $30 in today’s dollars). I chose Saturday.

As it turned out, Hoffa’s remains were never found. He’s still missing. So no one won the office pool (except my supervisor, who didn’t return the wagers even though there was no “winner”). Hoffa was legally declared dead in 1982, although the case officially is still open.

The Hoffa bet popped into my mind amid the big news last night that newly re-inaugurated President Donald J. Trump pardoned or commuted nearly 1,600 rioters who had a hand in storming the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021. Those receiving his grace included several convicted of seditious conspiracy.

Since I’m now New to Las Vegas, let’s start a new pool. In what month going forward will the first of these releasees be re-arrested on charges of committing another criminal act of some kind? In my view, with such a large universe of suddenly emboldened suspected hooligans for whom law and order has proven to be an elusive concept, it’s certain to happen. Just a matter of when.
Continue reading

Soon, here comes the judge in Las Vegas newspaper litigation

The hearings have been held and almost all the briefs are in. It will be up to a federal judge in Nevada to decide if the Las Vegas Sun will ever see the light of print again. A ruling could come soon. In my view, it’s a loooong shot for the 76-year-old daily newspaper.

To recap: In 2019 the Sun, owned by founder kin Brian Greenspun, sued its business partner, the Las Vegas Review-Journal, owned by the mega-multi-billion-dollar Adelson family, claiming violations of federal antitrust laws. In 1989 the two papers had entered into a Joint Operating Agreement under which the RJ would handle advertising, printing and circulation for both papers while sending the Sun a small cut of cash flow to cover its editorial costs for an separate publication. In 2005 JOA arrangements were changed to make the Sun a daily ad-free section within the RJ. The JOA was set to expire in 2040.

All this happened amid the meltdown in newspaper revenues thanks to online sources like Craigslist, which siphoned away lucrative classified ads. In 2020 I estimated in this space that the Las Vegas JOA was losing $10 million a year. Remarkably, that figure was later confirmed by an RJ executive in open-court testimony. But it really was no surprise; even counting new digital subscribers, circulation of the RJ has declined 77% under Adelson ownership.

Earlier this year, Anne R. Traum, the patient federal district judge hearing the matter in Las Vegas (although she is based in Reno), gave the Sun the latest in a series of injunctions requiring the RJ to continue printing the Sun pending outcome of the federal litigation. But the RJ won a ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco voiding the injunction as well as the JOA. The reason: That 2005 change in the JOA required permission of the U.S. Attorney General, which was never given. After the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the Sun‘s appeal, the RJ daringly stopped printing the Sun on April 3. That led to the present flurry of legal activity in which the Sun, which is still online, seeks another must-print injunction. Two days of hearings took place last month. Greenspun testified he doesn’t have the wherewithal to finance the print product on his own. Continue reading