UPDATED: It Didn’t Stay Here: Thousands of Las Vegas references in Jeffrey Epstein files

Jeffrey Epstein Las Vegas

Jeffrey Epstein

SEE UPDATES AT END OF POST

Originally published February 9, 2026
Updated February 13, 2026
Updated March 5, 2026
Updated April 10, 2026

Perhaps the latest national pastime is pawing through the millions of documents that Congress forced the Trump Administration to cough up and put online concerning the long-running Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse scandal. Anyone with an Internet connection, a high tolerance for mind-numbing detail and some time can partake.

That includes the staff at the New To Las Vegas world headquarters. But not, it seems, what’s left of the diminished Las Vegas or Nevada news media. None seems to have bothered taking the trouble to pursue the local angle and publish anything beyond wire-service reports.

’tis a pity. For as it turns out, there are simply thousands and thousands of documents referencing Las Vegas. Mainly collected or generated by the FBI, they range from the criminal to the mundane. Many names and institutions are identified. Reputations stand to be damaged.

This collectively makes some of the characters in the Epstein files terrific candidates for my long-running list, It Didn’t Stay Here. The criterion is simple: trouble elsewhere (in Washington, D.C., where the documents were released) for things that happened in that bug light of mischief called Las Vegas. It’s a firm rebuttal to that famous former Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority marketing slogan, “What Happens Here, Stays Here.” You can see the list nearby. Las Vegas’s large presence in the Epstein files also underscores Sin City’s amazing ability to pop up in far-flung national matters.

Continue reading

After Las Vegas fixes Cesar Chavez’s legacy, let’s ponder renaming Carson City

Carson City

Kit Carson

See update at end of story

It’s been a terrible, terrible month for the reputation of Cesar Chavez (1927-1993). On March 18 The New York Times published its five-year investigation uncovering the long-celebrated farmworkers union leader’s long sexual abuse of girls and others. Governmental and private leaders who had venerated him for decades immediately started racing to distance themselves and take his name off stuff. A debate has started about appropriate new names.

For me, it’s an easy fix. Simply rename everything possible for Dolores Huerta, who co-founded what became the United Farm Workers with Chavez and in many circles is equally as famous. She was also his victim, suffering his sexual abuse and bearing him two children–at least one the product of rape–and secretly giving them away lest their labor union movement be damaged. Huerta finally broke her silence earlier this month at age 95 to The Times, whose stories about Chavez undoubtedly will win a Pulitzer Prize.

As a state with relatively little farming and a weak union structure, Nevada doesn’t have a lot of things bearing Chavez’s name. Remedial actions could include renaming the Las Vegas park and the portion of a Las Vegas street unofficially sporting his name, and changing a state law that requires the governor to issue a proclamation every year designating Chavez’s birthday on March 31 as Cesar Chavez Day.

But while we’re at it here, I also think it’s time to consider renaming our remote state capital of Carson City. It’s currently named after Kit Carson (1809-1868). He was a celebrated, even legendary, mountain man and wilderness guide. But in my view he was also a war criminal, and not just once. Carson killed Indians and Latinos almost for sport in service of a U.S. government relentlessly pushing West to steal as much land and wealth as it could in the name of American exceptionalism. Continue reading

It Didn’t Stay Here: Alleged California wine industry plot included bribery in Las Vegas

It Didn't Stay HereAh, Las Vegas. As I have called it here many times, a bug light for mischief. Its lure is so irresistible to so many. But beware its famous one-time marketing slogan, “What Happens Here, Stays Here.” It simply isn’t true. Just review my documented inventory nearby of candidates for my path-breaking list, It Didn’t Stay Here. These are folks who got in trouble somewhere else for something that happened in Las Vegas. It’s a long roster going back nearly a decade that contains some very famous names.

The latest nominees are mainly drawn from a group of California wine industry executives recently accused of conspiring to use bribery and then cover-ups to control placement of wine products on supermarket shelves in California. By now, you can probably figure out where some of that alleged bribe money was allegedly spent. Being indicted in California for stuff said to have happened in Las Vegas is definitely trouble elsewhere.

The indictment, the cover page of which is nearby, was returned by a federal grand jury in Oakland, Calif., as part of a long-running investigation. It accuses five ex-executives of Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits, the country’s largest liquor distributor, or wholesaler, of what amounts to commercial bribery in providing the gifts over an eight-year period ending in 2024. The alleged idea was to get shelf space for new brands at Albertsons, one of the country’s largest supermarket chains. Although Albertsons has a number of locations in Las Vegas, it does not appear from the indictment any of the “hot wine” got placed here, or elsewhere in Nevada.

But the indictment describes several interesting journeys to Sin City. Continue reading

In Las Vegas, a scam toll violation notice from California

scam toll violation noticeAt the New to Las Vegas world headquarters today, I received by text message the nearby slightly-redacted-by-me “California Superior Court Subpoena” concerning a “toll violation” in our adjoining state. It’s a scam. But sadly, as I discovered, neither the California court system nor the California Department of Motor Vehicles website has a good and quick way to report this mischief, which obviously tarnishes their good names.

Clearly, I am not the only person to get this stuff. The Federal Trade Commission even has a warning on its website. But at least I can point out a few problems for others who might also get these messages. Take a close look at the document. Then let us together count the warning signs, some of which actually are quite ludicrous. Continue reading